Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Marquez Valdes-Scantling
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="easyk83" data-source="post: 894863" data-attributes="member: 8895"><p>Do we presently have another playmaker on the roster?</p><p></p><p>Does our need for a more consistent number 3/4 receiving option outweigh our holes elsewhere on the team? We lack depth at ILB and CB with Kings likely departure, we also have a star LT who just went down with an ACL and a question mark on the other side of the line. We need help at OL to help protect our HoF quarterback who looks like he has another 4-5 years in him if we can keep him upright. As it were, we can live with him and while frustrating he still adds value. The cost of upgrading the position might not be worth lost opportunity elsewhere. There's a reason why teams put up with receivers of his playmaking ability combined with his defects, and its the same reason that a strikeout prone slugger is often tolerated in an MLB lineup. MVS is a scoring threat from anywhere on the field.</p><p></p><p>Right now Id say our top 3 receiving options excluding backs are 1) Davante Adams, 2) Robert Tonyan, 3) Allen Lazard. So is option receiving option number 4 worth more than protecting Rodgers or shoring up our perimeter defense?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="easyk83, post: 894863, member: 8895"] Do we presently have another playmaker on the roster? Does our need for a more consistent number 3/4 receiving option outweigh our holes elsewhere on the team? We lack depth at ILB and CB with Kings likely departure, we also have a star LT who just went down with an ACL and a question mark on the other side of the line. We need help at OL to help protect our HoF quarterback who looks like he has another 4-5 years in him if we can keep him upright. As it were, we can live with him and while frustrating he still adds value. The cost of upgrading the position might not be worth lost opportunity elsewhere. There's a reason why teams put up with receivers of his playmaking ability combined with his defects, and its the same reason that a strikeout prone slugger is often tolerated in an MLB lineup. MVS is a scoring threat from anywhere on the field. Right now Id say our top 3 receiving options excluding backs are 1) Davante Adams, 2) Robert Tonyan, 3) Allen Lazard. So is option receiving option number 4 worth more than protecting Rodgers or shoring up our perimeter defense? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Today at 2:22 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Prior to Training Camp - Predicting the 53 Man Roster
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
Yesterday at 11:32 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 8:45 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 WR room
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 6:56 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Yesterday at 6:47 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Marquez Valdes-Scantling
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top