Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Losers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="adambr2" data-source="post: 547677" data-attributes="member: 7277"><p>Devils advocate question here, but -- couldn't it be argued that as long as Rodgers is here, the Packers will always be a contender, regardless of their situation? </p><p></p><p>Say for example the Packers make a huge few moves, win Super Bowl 50, and wind up going through salary cap hell by 2017. They keep Rodgers no matter what of course, so couldn't it be argued that even in a situation like that, they remain contenders and the ends justify the means?</p><p></p><p>Just asking for the sake of debate. I think it could just as easily be argued that we followed that model in Favre's later years, and it led to the 4-12 season and 8-8 seasons of 2005 and 2006, so we know how that went. Though Favre didn't seem to have the ability to succeed in his later years regardless of his supporting cast like Brady seems to be able to do in New England.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="adambr2, post: 547677, member: 7277"] Devils advocate question here, but -- couldn't it be argued that as long as Rodgers is here, the Packers will always be a contender, regardless of their situation? Say for example the Packers make a huge few moves, win Super Bowl 50, and wind up going through salary cap hell by 2017. They keep Rodgers no matter what of course, so couldn't it be argued that even in a situation like that, they remain contenders and the ends justify the means? Just asking for the sake of debate. I think it could just as easily be argued that we followed that model in Favre's later years, and it led to the 4-12 season and 8-8 seasons of 2005 and 2006, so we know how that went. Though Favre didn't seem to have the ability to succeed in his later years regardless of his supporting cast like Brady seems to be able to do in New England. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
R
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: rmontro
34 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 8:08 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 7:59 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 7:44 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 7:40 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Losers
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top