Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="GoPGo" data-source="post: 564616" data-attributes="member: 9064">I see.  So Shields and Hayward didn't care if they got beat by a ****-poor WR from Saginaw Valley State.  They were just trying to make the kid look good, right?<img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/rolleyes.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll Eyes    :rolleyes:" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" />And those scouting reports are inconsistent.  You have one saying "doesn't get in and out of breaks well" and another saying "shifts his momentum well with smooth footwork in/out of his breaks."  Which is it?  You have one report stating, "lacks suddenness in space to create much separation" and another saying, "Accelerates into routes quickly and can separate vertically."  Which is it?  Point is, the people who make these reports aren't NFL scouts.  They're media clowns like Mel Kiper who are tasked with a time-table to have something to print. No, but I've seen every snap where he was targeted in 2013.Because you acknowledged that he was superior to his D-II competition, meaning he should have been playing D-I.Like Shields and Hayward?  Oh right.  They wanted to get burned by a nobody with no talent.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 998 (members: 0, guests: 998)