Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="bigbubbatd" data-source="post: 677941" data-attributes="member: 10784">Did people actually read the quote? Seriously he didnt throw Rodgers under the bus. That headline and editorial along with it are pretty bad. Lang said they need to get better but that a couple of the sacks came when Rodgers had time. He knows that is where a lot of big plays have come from.  To the Rodgers stuff people are right we need to dump the ball off more but his testing the defense did result in some big plays. Two PI penalties of 30 plus yards. A completion to Jordy for big yards. There was a ball Adams really probably should have made a play on without having offensive pi.  Last year we were asking for more big plays. This year we are asking for more of what last year was - dump offs. Short passes.  We need a mixture of both.  Honestly the offense would have looked fine last night if Rodgers was accurate. He missed open guys 5-7 times.  Also pass plays accounted for over 300 yards when you factor in nearly 100 yards of pass interference penalties and Rodgers long td run.  We actually should account for both those things because the interference took away would be catches and qb scrambling is no different than a dump off. Dont get me wrong it wasnt pretty but the yards were there</blockquote>

Total: 112 (members: 3, guests: 109)