Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Lane Taylor agrees to restructure contract
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 877816"><p>At the risk of repetition, the simple answer is probably the best one: Taylor provides experienced depth particularly on the left side. Of all those names behind last year's starters, there's Patrick with about a 1/2 season worth of snaps under his belt and looking like a keeper; Light with a smattering of inauspicious snaps (151) probably belongs just outside the bubble where you put him. And that's it as far as experience goes.</p><p></p><p>Retaining Taylor, at this juncture anyway, should be viewed in the same light as Taylor starting last year--risk mitigation. There's just no way to know what these other guys might offer until you put them on the field after a bunch of mostly non-contact camp and preseason play against 2nd. stringers, 3rd. stringers and camp bodies. The issue is more accute with a truncated offseason and maybe a shortened preseason. </p><p></p><p>The terms of the new contract are murky, but it does not appear there is any new impediment to cutting him or maybe trading him if they're happy with somebody else coming off the bench, though doing that after asking for the pay cut smacks of bad faith so I'd discount that happening.</p><p></p><p>Why Taylor would take the pay cut is perhaps the more interesting question. Why not say "no", get cut and test the market? The answer may be a simple one. It's kinda late for that to start with. He's coming off biceps surgery at age 30, was at best an adequate starter when healthy, and perhaps more importantly there's no opportunity to visit a team for a medical exam. The market for his services would not be good.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 877816"] At the risk of repetition, the simple answer is probably the best one: Taylor provides experienced depth particularly on the left side. Of all those names behind last year's starters, there's Patrick with about a 1/2 season worth of snaps under his belt and looking like a keeper; Light with a smattering of inauspicious snaps (151) probably belongs just outside the bubble where you put him. And that's it as far as experience goes. Retaining Taylor, at this juncture anyway, should be viewed in the same light as Taylor starting last year--risk mitigation. There's just no way to know what these other guys might offer until you put them on the field after a bunch of mostly non-contact camp and preseason play against 2nd. stringers, 3rd. stringers and camp bodies. The issue is more accute with a truncated offseason and maybe a shortened preseason. The terms of the new contract are murky, but it does not appear there is any new impediment to cutting him or maybe trading him if they're happy with somebody else coming off the bench, though doing that after asking for the pay cut smacks of bad faith so I'd discount that happening. Why Taylor would take the pay cut is perhaps the more interesting question. Why not say "no", get cut and test the market? The answer may be a simple one. It's kinda late for that to start with. He's coming off biceps surgery at age 30, was at best an adequate starter when healthy, and perhaps more importantly there's no opportunity to visit a team for a medical exam. The market for his services would not be good. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
R
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: rmontro
34 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: rmontro
39 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 4:23 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 2:53 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Wisky newbie
Latest: milani
Today at 2:09 PM
Introduce Yourself
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Lane Taylor agrees to restructure contract
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
