Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Kizer
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mondio" data-source="post: 812067" data-attributes="member: 10441"><p>They were coaches in the NFL that had won a Super bowl. Do you really think they couldn't see that Taysom Hill was an athlete? who was he going to replace? We needed every down players, hill is not. it was a toss up if they could even keep someone as worthless at receiver as Davis for a PR duty. Now people think we should have kept 2 situational only players? He's not that great of a return man. he's not a special teams ace. I can think of 14,000 more plays I'd rather run with Rodgers at QB than Hill. </p><p></p><p>Let's assume though that you guys are correct, the staff just didn't see any value to having Hill or that he couldn't do things on the football field, even though anybody with 2 eyes watching at home could see he was an athlete. But had they kept him, who's spot on the roster was he taking, and then who was he bumping off the active day roster to be a gadget player. I thin Janis was a better cover man, Davis was at least as good of return man, nobody better be playing QB unless rodgers is hurt, who should he have replaced? Remember, the Saints brought him in as a QB on their roster, and then year later traded for Teddy Bridgewater. Let that sink in.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mondio, post: 812067, member: 10441"] They were coaches in the NFL that had won a Super bowl. Do you really think they couldn't see that Taysom Hill was an athlete? who was he going to replace? We needed every down players, hill is not. it was a toss up if they could even keep someone as worthless at receiver as Davis for a PR duty. Now people think we should have kept 2 situational only players? He's not that great of a return man. he's not a special teams ace. I can think of 14,000 more plays I'd rather run with Rodgers at QB than Hill. Let's assume though that you guys are correct, the staff just didn't see any value to having Hill or that he couldn't do things on the football field, even though anybody with 2 eyes watching at home could see he was an athlete. But had they kept him, who's spot on the roster was he taking, and then who was he bumping off the active day roster to be a gadget player. I thin Janis was a better cover man, Davis was at least as good of return man, nobody better be playing QB unless rodgers is hurt, who should he have replaced? Remember, the Saints brought him in as a QB on their roster, and then year later traded for Teddy Bridgewater. Let that sink in. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
G
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: GleefulGary
Today at 3:30 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 1st Rd pick #25 Jorden Morgan OL
Latest: gopkrs
Today at 3:00 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: gopkrs
Today at 2:51 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: rmontro
Today at 2:03 AM
Draft Talk
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: AKCheese
Today at 12:51 AM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Kizer
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top