Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Kicking The Fiscal "Can" Actual Numbers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pkrjones" data-source="post: 948975" data-attributes="member: 9982"><p>IMHO the NFL won't place more restrictions on cap shenanigans, as the current set-up allows players to make the most money. If the GM's/owners are "OK" kicking the can into future years the NFL shouldn't need to protect them from their own folly. This practice almost guaranties that a top team will eventually implode, allowing other teams to surpass them and creating "balance" or parity within a division or conference (eventually).</p><p></p><p>I, personally, don't like the idea of void years or trading future years' draft picks (more than 1 year out) as it allows short-term loading-up by teams but creates "dark years" for that team. IF a team desperately wants to significantly jump up in the draft they would need to package current & next year picks (only 1 year out) AND current players. This would limit years (decades) of non-competitiveness by dumb GM's trashing a team's future only to be fired later that year or the next.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pkrjones, post: 948975, member: 9982"] IMHO the NFL won't place more restrictions on cap shenanigans, as the current set-up allows players to make the most money. If the GM's/owners are "OK" kicking the can into future years the NFL shouldn't need to protect them from their own folly. This practice almost guaranties that a top team will eventually implode, allowing other teams to surpass them and creating "balance" or parity within a division or conference (eventually). I, personally, don't like the idea of void years or trading future years' draft picks (more than 1 year out) as it allows short-term loading-up by teams but creates "dark years" for that team. IF a team desperately wants to significantly jump up in the draft they would need to package current & next year picks (only 1 year out) AND current players. This would limit years (decades) of non-competitiveness by dumb GM's trashing a team's future only to be fired later that year or the next. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
rmontro
Latest posts
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: OldSchool101
31 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
F
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Firethorn1001
Today at 8:49 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 7:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Today at 6:52 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: milani
Today at 5:37 PM
Movies and Entertainment
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Kicking The Fiscal "Can" Actual Numbers
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top