Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="sschind" data-source="post: 620038" data-attributes="member: 10247">You prefer to go with what we have and yet you don't see white making the 53.  So we either go with 4 wideouts or someone else passes him.  IMO Jones steps in at #3 at the very least and maybe even #2 to start the season.  Looking at our guys I'd take him over Janis or Montgomery at this point.  I just don't see a downside in bringing him in even if it costs a low round draft pick.The Packers let him go because the Raiders offered him more money than they were willing to pay.  I'm guessing it wouldn't take anything close to that much to get him back.  As for why the Raiders let him go, I don't think anyone really knows.  I think it came as a surprise to a lot of people.  He was their leading WR in targets and catches (close second in yards) he did have the 3 fumbles and and 5 drops but his drops percentage was below the likes of Gronkowski, Graham, Hilton, Benjamin, oh and some guy named Randall Cobb.</blockquote>

Total: 57 (members: 5, guests: 52)