Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Jordan Love 2025 Version
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Voyageur" data-source="post: 1065890" data-attributes="member: 17953"><p>When we talk about improving the WR room and feeling they fell short always remember that WRs can make a QB look good and QBs can make WRs look good. I feel that our problem was less in our WR room and more in the lack of QB experience, and possibly even tutelage in improving his field of vision. </p><p></p><p>As much credit as we give our offensive line, and we should, we also have to remember that part of the reason they played well is the running game with Josh Jacobs and that offensive line wore down defenses early in games, making the passing game more effective.</p><p></p><p>When you put all the varies into the equation of where you need improvement you see a little different picture based on the way each phase of an offense complements others.</p><p></p><p>I see our RB room getting a bit better because of the familiarity between our line and Jacobs, and the inclusion of Lloyd to the mix. It can be a punishing run game "if" the Packers utilize the quick short passes that freezes defensive lines and throws them and the linebackers off rhythm. The more this area has improved, the better results we'll see from our WRs and our TEs, as well as Love and if necessary, our backup QBs.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Voyageur, post: 1065890, member: 17953"] When we talk about improving the WR room and feeling they fell short always remember that WRs can make a QB look good and QBs can make WRs look good. I feel that our problem was less in our WR room and more in the lack of QB experience, and possibly even tutelage in improving his field of vision. As much credit as we give our offensive line, and we should, we also have to remember that part of the reason they played well is the running game with Josh Jacobs and that offensive line wore down defenses early in games, making the passing game more effective. When you put all the varies into the equation of where you need improvement you see a little different picture based on the way each phase of an offense complements others. I see our RB room getting a bit better because of the familiarity between our line and Jacobs, and the inclusion of Lloyd to the mix. It can be a punishing run game "if" the Packers utilize the quick short passes that freezes defensive lines and throws them and the linebackers off rhythm. The more this area has improved, the better results we'll see from our WRs and our TEs, as well as Love and if necessary, our backup QBs. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Heyjoe4
Latest posts
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Today at 3:25 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
Today at 12:29 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Cornelius Weems
Today at 12:05 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 7:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Yesterday at 6:52 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Jordan Love 2025 Version
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top