Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Jones needs to stay
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1021765" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>That’s true. I also like to look at the global view. Trading Rasul all by itself saves us $7mil -less replacement player costs. Even if we go with a Higher draft pick at RB? we’re talking $4-6mil off recent cap projections. Applying that to a high end, veteran contract such as Jones’ deal. Now he’s a priority contract locked and loaded at a palatable number. It’s a shell game of resources and capital expenditures.</p><p></p><p>That’s how I look at it anyway it’s like a balance sheet. I also suspect we’ll bring in cheaper help in the form of Day2-3 draft pick(s) that keep the RB room financially balanced. Maybe that doesn’t make sense to others but it’s how my brain balances personnel compensation <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 1021765, member: 10086"] That’s true. I also like to look at the global view. Trading Rasul all by itself saves us $7mil -less replacement player costs. Even if we go with a Higher draft pick at RB? we’re talking $4-6mil off recent cap projections. Applying that to a high end, veteran contract such as Jones’ deal. Now he’s a priority contract locked and loaded at a palatable number. It’s a shell game of resources and capital expenditures. That’s how I look at it anyway it’s like a balance sheet. I also suspect we’ll bring in cheaper help in the form of Day2-3 draft pick(s) that keep the RB room financially balanced. Maybe that doesn’t make sense to others but it’s how my brain balances personnel compensation :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
2025 NFL Schedule Release
Latest: OldSchool101
30 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Mike McCarthy Gone
Latest: lambeaulambo
54 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
First Round Prospect Discussions Specifically
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 9:40 PM
Draft Talk
Pick 87 Savion Williams WR TCU
Latest: AmishMafia
Today at 8:47 PM
Draft Talk
Pick 124 Barryn Sorrell Edge Texas
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 7:39 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Jones needs to stay
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top