Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 794365" data-attributes="member: 7261">I'm not dodging your response, but I haven't paid attention to the Vikings, since the Packers played them.  I will take your word on the fact that they are struggling. I don't even know which of their starters are missing?  Are the true healthy starters themselves struggling or is having 2 backups in pulling them all down?  Are the normally sure tacklers and cover guys looking lost and missing tackles?I don't know how to say it any clearer than just keep repeating myself, so after this, I am going to stop.  Given the amount of draft resources that the Packers have pumped into the secondary in the last 5 years, I would expect not only a much better unit, but much better individual players than the ones that have been out there every week.  If you wan't to blame injuries, that is your prerogative, but if that is yours and the Packers excuse every week, than Whitt should be safe for another 10 years. If Whitt can't do something with King, Jackson and Alexander in the next 3 years, I'm running out of even hopeful scenarios for the guy, as well as the Packers secondary while he is coaching.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 438 (members: 0, guests: 438)