Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="PackersRS" data-source="post: 252391" data-attributes="member: 1429">Rodgers wasn't accounted as Romo was because Dallas was the 8th best D in the league last year... GB's was the 20th.  Again, 20th defense. Show WHEN Rodgers was responsible for the loss. He rallied to get the lead in the 4th quarter in some games, only to have the D fail to keep the lead. And he was basically in his rookie season. So you're saying Rodgers should just throw the ball to the air and hope his receivers get the ball, instead of waiting for them to actually get open?One int and one fumble lost against 7 TDs. That helps you win, no matter how you put it. You're saying half the sacks are his responsability? So show it. <a href="http://packerslounge.com/2009/10/12/ol-perceptionreality/" target="_blank">OL Perception/Reality l Packers Lounge</a> He does have the blame, but the OL is plain bad, and that's a fact. I'd take a sack over an INT anytime. Yes it is a larger issue. But the issue is the Coaches, not Rodgers.<a href="http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/sports/64445032.html" target="_blank">Woodson speaks - JSOnline</a></blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 1,003 (members: 0, guests: 1,003)