Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
I've HAD it!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bogart" data-source="post: 402413" data-attributes="member: 3900"><p>From another stand point I think losing a game can help you, cause it gives you something to work on and show what you need fixing. The Patriots never lost a game, and went to the Super Bowl in 2007, thinking they were perfect when in all evidence they weren't.</p><p></p><p>Yes the Saints did try, but they were bound to lose a game. Everyday in the paper, they were losing a starter, and I think had they beat Dallas, Payton would have benched his full starters for the last two games, and he did going into Carolina. They caught flac for letting the Panthers win that, but he was more worried about going into the playoffs healthy. While Dallas fans bragged how they "blew them out" they only beat them by 7, (in all fairness, Saints would have beat their ***** had they been with the starters they were missing.)</p><p></p><p>That's what scares me.</p><p>If the Packers go 13-0 or 14-0 and wrap up home field advantage, and the division, are they going to rest the starters or risk them getting hurt to go undefeated?</p><p>New England does this quite often, they'll go into the last game, play their starters, and even when it came back to haunt them by losing Welker in 2009, on a game that didn't matter. What if the Bears lost a key starter when they just <em>had to</em> play their starters against us last year after wining the division? It comes and goes. Everyone wants to go undefeated, that's cool. But I'd rather lose the last 2 games, and not lose a starter or go to the Super Bowl undefeated and lose it like New England did.</p><p></p><p>Even if we have it wrapped up by the last game, i think McCarthy will play his starters vs Detriot, for a fair chance to not let them make the playoffs, and that is cool with me, but I don't want to lose a key starter in a game that don't matter after we've got everything under our thumbs.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bogart, post: 402413, member: 3900"] From another stand point I think losing a game can help you, cause it gives you something to work on and show what you need fixing. The Patriots never lost a game, and went to the Super Bowl in 2007, thinking they were perfect when in all evidence they weren't. Yes the Saints did try, but they were bound to lose a game. Everyday in the paper, they were losing a starter, and I think had they beat Dallas, Payton would have benched his full starters for the last two games, and he did going into Carolina. They caught flac for letting the Panthers win that, but he was more worried about going into the playoffs healthy. While Dallas fans bragged how they "blew them out" they only beat them by 7, (in all fairness, Saints would have beat their ***** had they been with the starters they were missing.) That's what scares me. If the Packers go 13-0 or 14-0 and wrap up home field advantage, and the division, are they going to rest the starters or risk them getting hurt to go undefeated? New England does this quite often, they'll go into the last game, play their starters, and even when it came back to haunt them by losing Welker in 2009, on a game that didn't matter. What if the Bears lost a key starter when they just [I]had to[/I] play their starters against us last year after wining the division? It comes and goes. Everyone wants to go undefeated, that's cool. But I'd rather lose the last 2 games, and not lose a starter or go to the Super Bowl undefeated and lose it like New England did. Even if we have it wrapped up by the last game, i think McCarthy will play his starters vs Detriot, for a fair chance to not let them make the playoffs, and that is cool with me, but I don't want to lose a key starter in a game that don't matter after we've got everything under our thumbs. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
R
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: rmontro
Today at 9:17 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 8:08 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 7:59 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 7:44 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 7:40 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
I've HAD it!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top