Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Is this professional management?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="12theTruth" data-source="post: 515357"><p>You should add a team that will also be hamstrung by their salary structure. Once Shields, Raji, or Finley get their $$$$$</p><p>I've read where almost a third of the Packers payroll will be tied up in 3 players.</p><p></p><p>Ben McAdoo is a rather anonymous member of this coaching staff. He coaches QB's but when McCarthy gave him the job he had no prior experience at any level (according to this Packers.com profile) either coaching QB's or even playing the position. I am of a sneaking suspicion that when McCarthy rounds out his staff his number one prerequisite is loyalty immediately followed by familiarity. I don't think you can discount McAdoo has a factor in the struggles to develop a quality backup to Aaron Rodgers.</p><p></p><p>Our special teams are not so good this year. In fact if you look at the entirety of Slocum's coaching history with the Packers he is probably the 2nd weakest link on McCarthy's coaching staff. Packers can live without a Devin Hester type PR/KR but you'd think they'd at least be able to field someone serviceable. Ted will find a stop-gap solution.</p><p></p><p>I don't agree with your assessment at all with the DB's. When healthy we have a nice lineup back there. Its just that when injuries rear their ugly head our backups don't yet have the ability to capably fill in.</p><p></p><p>RB's I think Brandon Jackson was a 2nd round pick. That's not seriously addressing the position? By the way I pretty much nailed the Packers draft needs this last offseason, and I was going ape about the need to draft a RB with a high pick. I remember getting considerable disagreement about that. Heck Thompson at least takes the OL seriously as he has drafted the heck out of that position including again in this past draft. Generally speaking you want a good line for your backs.</p><p></p><p></p><p>OL- Hard to argue with you on this one. Can't blame Teddy T for this one though. I think if McCarthy and Rodgers can get on the same page we can cater to the current run blocking capabilities of this unit more so as their pass protection leaves much to be desired. Sort of ironic that after going 42 straight games without a 100 yard runner the Packers have two consecutive games of doing so. <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/confused.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":confused:" title="Confused :confused:" data-shortname=":confused:" /></p><p></p><p>I've hated on Crosby in the past . But is now really the time to do it. He is 4-4 after all for the season. Likely there will plenty of time for that as the season progresses.</p><p></p><p>Here is something nice about Mike McCarthy. He has a steadfast loyalty to his men and with his philosophy. But that can be a double edged sword as we've seen at times before and more than ever in the present.</p><p></p><p>Most teams and their fan bases would die to be in the position that the Packers are in. Great QB, Great Winning Tradition, Great Stadium, and a very good GM despite your implications in the original post.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="12theTruth, post: 515357"] You should add a team that will also be hamstrung by their salary structure. Once Shields, Raji, or Finley get their $$$$$ I've read where almost a third of the Packers payroll will be tied up in 3 players. Ben McAdoo is a rather anonymous member of this coaching staff. He coaches QB's but when McCarthy gave him the job he had no prior experience at any level (according to this Packers.com profile) either coaching QB's or even playing the position. I am of a sneaking suspicion that when McCarthy rounds out his staff his number one prerequisite is loyalty immediately followed by familiarity. I don't think you can discount McAdoo has a factor in the struggles to develop a quality backup to Aaron Rodgers. Our special teams are not so good this year. In fact if you look at the entirety of Slocum's coaching history with the Packers he is probably the 2nd weakest link on McCarthy's coaching staff. Packers can live without a Devin Hester type PR/KR but you'd think they'd at least be able to field someone serviceable. Ted will find a stop-gap solution. I don't agree with your assessment at all with the DB's. When healthy we have a nice lineup back there. Its just that when injuries rear their ugly head our backups don't yet have the ability to capably fill in. RB's I think Brandon Jackson was a 2nd round pick. That's not seriously addressing the position? By the way I pretty much nailed the Packers draft needs this last offseason, and I was going ape about the need to draft a RB with a high pick. I remember getting considerable disagreement about that. Heck Thompson at least takes the OL seriously as he has drafted the heck out of that position including again in this past draft. Generally speaking you want a good line for your backs. OL- Hard to argue with you on this one. Can't blame Teddy T for this one though. I think if McCarthy and Rodgers can get on the same page we can cater to the current run blocking capabilities of this unit more so as their pass protection leaves much to be desired. Sort of ironic that after going 42 straight games without a 100 yard runner the Packers have two consecutive games of doing so. :confused: I've hated on Crosby in the past . But is now really the time to do it. He is 4-4 after all for the season. Likely there will plenty of time for that as the season progresses. Here is something nice about Mike McCarthy. He has a steadfast loyalty to his men and with his philosophy. But that can be a double edged sword as we've seen at times before and more than ever in the present. Most teams and their fan bases would die to be in the position that the Packers are in. Great QB, Great Winning Tradition, Great Stadium, and a very good GM despite your implications in the original post. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
gopkrs
Latest posts
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 12:32 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: Poppa San
Today at 11:57 AM
Movies and Entertainment
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: gopkrs
Today at 11:08 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Badgers Football 2025-2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:07 AM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 8:43 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Is this professional management?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
