Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="mcoomer146" data-source="post: 372496" data-attributes="member: 4658">There is one thing wrong with this TOP 100 OF 2011.  Some guys are being ranked by their career stats, others are being ranked by their 2010 stats.  Here are the stats for the 4 top QBsRodgersTDS 28INT 11YDS 3,922RTG 101.2BreesTDS 33INT 22YDS 4,620RTG 90.9BradyTDS 36INT 4YDS 3,900RTG 111.0ManningTDS 33INT 17YDS 4,700RTG 91.9Look at Rodgers numbers.  He threw 5 less TDs than Brees but Brees threw twice as many INTS.  The threw for more yards than brady and had a better passer rating than all but Brady.  In my books that makes him the number 2 QB from 2010.  I believe last year Brady was the best because of the TDS to INT ratio, but he played better than brees and manning.but if you base it on career stats, sure rodgers is in the right spot because the other guys have been starters longer and have proved over a period of time they are the bestThey should have worked out the criteria long before putting this list together.Oh and Bucky Brooks doesnt have a clue about whos who</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 747 (members: 0, guests: 747)