Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Interesting Theory Shared With A Friend...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sschind" data-source="post: 905489" data-attributes="member: 10247"><p>Holy speculation Batman. Where do I begin?</p><p> </p><p>1. I've read nothing that says the Packers wanted to add void years to Rodgers contract. </p><p>2. I've read nothing that said the vikings were offering 2 first rounders for Favre. </p><p>3. Why is it an insult to offer a player they don't want chance to stay if he wants to. If anything I think its a sign of respect. We are going to cut you but we will keep you if you really want to stay. Its up to the player then if he really wants to stay or not. Obviously he didn't. In most cases when player says they would like to stay it is usually up to them but the money usually ends up being more important than staying.</p><p>4. Are you saying they do or do not need his permission to restructure. I'm not sure what is ridiculous about it. </p><p>5. They could have restructured but they didn't have to so why do something they don't have to especially if it is going to cause problems down the road. plus they still can free up almost 10 million if they want to.</p><p>6. Some people do not believe the Favre situation was mishandled. He said he was retiring so they moved on. I get sick of hearing the "he earned it" crap. </p><p>7. It seems to me that you are on the players side against the team and that's fine. I happen to be of the belief that no player is more than the team and that if one player is causing problems you either work it out or you move on. Yeah it might suck to lose a star but I'll get over it. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Because they didn't win. Isn't it obvious that if a team doesn't win the Super Bowl they didn't do all they could to win the Super Bowl because if they had done all they could have done they would have won it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sschind, post: 905489, member: 10247"] Holy speculation Batman. Where do I begin? 1. I've read nothing that says the Packers wanted to add void years to Rodgers contract. 2. I've read nothing that said the vikings were offering 2 first rounders for Favre. 3. Why is it an insult to offer a player they don't want chance to stay if he wants to. If anything I think its a sign of respect. We are going to cut you but we will keep you if you really want to stay. Its up to the player then if he really wants to stay or not. Obviously he didn't. In most cases when player says they would like to stay it is usually up to them but the money usually ends up being more important than staying. 4. Are you saying they do or do not need his permission to restructure. I'm not sure what is ridiculous about it. 5. They could have restructured but they didn't have to so why do something they don't have to especially if it is going to cause problems down the road. plus they still can free up almost 10 million if they want to. 6. Some people do not believe the Favre situation was mishandled. He said he was retiring so they moved on. I get sick of hearing the "he earned it" crap. 7. It seems to me that you are on the players side against the team and that's fine. I happen to be of the belief that no player is more than the team and that if one player is causing problems you either work it out or you move on. Yeah it might suck to lose a star but I'll get over it. Because they didn't win. Isn't it obvious that if a team doesn't win the Super Bowl they didn't do all they could to win the Super Bowl because if they had done all they could have done they would have won it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Schultz
Latest posts
The Packers All-Personality Team
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 9:29 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
162-0
Latest: DoURant
Today at 7:55 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
P
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: PackFan727
Today at 7:08 PM
Draft Talk
Packers to Play in Brazil
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 6:31 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Packers Top 30 Prospect Visits
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 6:28 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Interesting Theory Shared With A Friend...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top