Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 730734" data-attributes="member: 7261">Personally, I think Ragland was a better fit for a 3-4 Defense, which Buffalo was when he was drafted, but now that they switched to a 4-3, he is on the outside looking in.  Missing his rookie year with a torn ACL didn't help him either.May have turned into a completely different story for Ragland had Green Bay drafted him.....3-4 defense and no torn ACL.  Goes to show you how one event (drafted by Buffalo) can change things.  In this case, 2 other events....torn ACL and his team switches to a 4-3 the following year.The knock on Ragland coming out of college was he wasn't good in coverage, so with what appears to be more emphasis on the new "Nitro" package in GB, he might not have ended up being a good fit.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 651 (members: 0, guests: 651)