Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="PackersRS" data-source="post: 246102" data-attributes="member: 1429">Woodson is hands down the best analyst in NFL.com. He just knows SO much about the game. And is a HoF. I really like Deion Sanders (WHAT!) as well. And got to respect Pat Kirwan. Disagree with him a lot of times, but he's been there, and was successful. I can't say the same about Gil Brandt. Sure, he was a MONSTER. But back in the 60's. It's no coincidence that the Cowboys went winning again right after he left. IMO the game has moved past him. (Yeah, I hold a grudge against him. Something about him LOVING Alex Smith and predicting that guy would be one of the best...). But Dukes is the worst. He hates GB because of Favre. He said last year Rodgers was gonna fail. And in NFLnetwork, every former player had to choose a current player to build a franchise around. Mr. Dukes' take? Michael freaking Vick. Say no more.-About the recognition, it's nice to hear someone that really knows what he's saying praising us. But any projections now are kind of a guess... You can use last year's performance from the players and the team as a whole, as well as schedulle, but you just don't know how the players are gonna perform, specially guys like Jeremy Thompson, Josh Sitton and such... (Yes, I know I'm an hypocrite. I have the right to rant once in a while... And so do the experts. Wow, hypocrite again.)</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 927 (members: 1, guests: 926)