Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Joe Nor Cal Packer" data-source="post: 628623" data-attributes="member: 9805">You're reasoning is sound. If the suggestion is that the D is significantly better in large part because Hawk is gone, well that pretty much gets blown away in the first three points you've made. And CMIII was already playing ILB last year. Daniels is a stud, he'll never get the franchise tag either TT will find a much more reasonable way to keep him, maybe Raji is serious about proving himself, and the secondary is better because Williams and House are GONE and have been replaced by smarter, more athletic, and more aggressive rookies. Stick to your guns. The D has been responsible for the last two wins. Why would anyone bother talking about Hawk. Who cares?</blockquote>

Total: 77 (members: 2, guests: 75)