Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="ivo610" data-source="post: 384727" data-attributes="member: 2128">Im not arguing for Ben to be higher, Im arguing that Dan watshisname shouldnt be above him. Even more so on a list that weighs heavily on "clutch situations" and who contributes to the win. Big Ben is one of the most clutch QBs I have seen in the past 15 years.ESPNs argument is that this formula will count more towards players who contribute more to wins.  But if they dont win how can they be ranked ahead of a SB winning QB (please the trent dilfer comment just made me laugh, its like you can name 2 guys that were not good QBs but played on HISTORIC defenses try to put it in perspective instead of just shouting those two) of that year.The difference in games also might count towards those sack numbers too. Just maybe. Does the formula weigh strength of schedule? Nope. Does it weigh O line? not that I know of.</blockquote>

Total: 850 (members: 1, guests: 849)