Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2016 Draft Archive
if coleman or doctson slips to 27.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 662481"><p>If there´s either an impact player at a position of need (DL, ILB) or a clear cut best player available (possibly Coleman or Doctson) there´s absolutely no reason to trade back.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Montgomery isn´t a polished route runner and doesn´t have the diverse route tree needed to play outside. In addition he has questionable hands, his catch radius is smaller than desired and he has troubles tracking deep balls. He´s a weapon in the slot though and that´s where the Packers should play him.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Once again, here´s a link to the widely used draft trade chart, you can figure out on your own what it would take to make trades happen.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/draft/draft-trade-chart/" target="_blank">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/draft/draft-trade-chart/</a></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>As long as there´s an impact player at inside linebacker or the defensive line on the board at #27 there´s no reason to draft a receiver. Coleman or Doctson could be a nice steal if positions of need can´t be adequately addressed at that spot though.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 6794, post: 662481"] If there´s either an impact player at a position of need (DL, ILB) or a clear cut best player available (possibly Coleman or Doctson) there´s absolutely no reason to trade back. Montgomery isn´t a polished route runner and doesn´t have the diverse route tree needed to play outside. In addition he has questionable hands, his catch radius is smaller than desired and he has troubles tracking deep balls. He´s a weapon in the slot though and that´s where the Packers should play him. Once again, here´s a link to the widely used draft trade chart, you can figure out on your own what it would take to make trades happen. [URL]http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/draft/draft-trade-chart/[/URL] As long as there´s an impact player at inside linebacker or the defensive line on the board at #27 there´s no reason to draft a receiver. Coleman or Doctson could be a nice steal if positions of need can´t be adequately addressed at that spot though. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
monte smith
SudsMcBucky
Pkrjones
Calebs Revenge
Latest posts
Just found out
Latest: OldSchool101
9 minutes ago
Movies and Entertainment
NFC North Predictions
Latest: Calebs Revenge
12 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2022 Draft Romeo Doubs #132
Latest: Voyageur
15 minutes ago
Draft Talk
State of our former QB, Aaron Rodgers
Latest: DoURant
53 minutes ago
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
Starting 5 - CB
Latest: Pkrjones
Today at 11:18 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2016 Draft Archive
if coleman or doctson slips to 27.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top