Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
I am impress
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TJV" data-source="post: 404271" data-attributes="member: 4300"><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">I'm not here to get in a pissing match either and I hope anyone that has read a few of my posts realizes that. And for as long as I've posted on forums I've never put a poster on ignore and that's not going to change. </span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">It astounds me to see a poster write that he would put someone on ignore for "writing negative/critical things" about the Packers. Of course it's one thing if a poster were <em>always</em> negative or critical but to have a problem reading the reasoned criticism of another Packers fan is just a shame IMO. Had the internet and that poster existed in the Dark Ages of Packer fandom (the period after Lombardi to Wolf) he probably wouldn't have been able to read a single post. Nowadays even the Packers own website prints negatives about the Packers. For example their November 6 article quoted Woodson's criticisms of the D: "… the way we went out and played defense today was disappointing in a lot of aspects" … "Just a lot of bad football." Even in the midst of this incredible winning streak, McCarthy talks about problems that need to be addressed and fixed. Do you put his press conferences on "ignore" because he's being negative? Is Woodson on that list for you, too? How informative or insightful would reading a 100% positive, ignore any and all problems board be? </span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">I understand the Favre fiasco split Packer Nation and it resulted in incredible acrimony among Packers fans and probably infested every Packers board on the net. But Thompson, McCarthy, and Rodgers (and IMO the actions of Favre after the split) decisively proved one side of those arguments wrong. Thankfully that's behind us now. So why the acrimony among Packers fans <em>now</em>? If we can't avoid the name-calling and nonsense now, during an historic winning streak with a QB having a season for the ages, when can we? </span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">Sorry for this tangent, I'm done with this. Back to the topic: I am <em>impress</em> too.</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TJV, post: 404271, member: 4300"] [FONT=Tahoma]I'm not here to get in a pissing match either and I hope anyone that has read a few of my posts realizes that. And for as long as I've posted on forums I've never put a poster on ignore and that's not going to change. [/FONT] [FONT=Tahoma]It astounds me to see a poster write that he would put someone on ignore for "writing negative/critical things" about the Packers. Of course it's one thing if a poster were [I]always[/I] negative or critical but to have a problem reading the reasoned criticism of another Packers fan is just a shame IMO. Had the internet and that poster existed in the Dark Ages of Packer fandom (the period after Lombardi to Wolf) he probably wouldn't have been able to read a single post. Nowadays even the Packers own website prints negatives about the Packers. For example their November 6 article quoted Woodson's criticisms of the D: "… the way we went out and played defense today was disappointing in a lot of aspects" … "Just a lot of bad football." Even in the midst of this incredible winning streak, McCarthy talks about problems that need to be addressed and fixed. Do you put his press conferences on "ignore" because he's being negative? Is Woodson on that list for you, too? How informative or insightful would reading a 100% positive, ignore any and all problems board be? [/FONT] [FONT=Tahoma]I understand the Favre fiasco split Packer Nation and it resulted in incredible acrimony among Packers fans and probably infested every Packers board on the net. But Thompson, McCarthy, and Rodgers (and IMO the actions of Favre after the split) decisively proved one side of those arguments wrong. Thankfully that's behind us now. So why the acrimony among Packers fans [I]now[/I]? If we can't avoid the name-calling and nonsense now, during an historic winning streak with a QB having a season for the ages, when can we? [/FONT] [FONT=Tahoma]Sorry for this tangent, I'm done with this. Back to the topic: I am [I]impress[/I] too.[/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: Thirteen Below
2 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: AKCheese
26 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: AKCheese
33 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: milani
54 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 12:11 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
I am impress
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top