Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="PackersRS" data-source="post: 358313" data-attributes="member: 1429">Adrian who? James Starks, *****. James Starks.No, seriously now, the highest I'd give for Peterson is a 3rd round pick. Now, don't get me wrong, he's the best back in football. But there are some things that prevent me from spending too much.1) We don't need him. We just won a SB without much of a running game, and found one later on. We get our #1 RB back.2) James Starks. The kid might prove to be something good.3) Duracy of RBs. They don't last long. Though he's only 26, he has already taken a beating. He has 5 more productive years out of him, if that much.4) The way we run our O. If he was Marshal Faulk, it would be a different thing. I'd give a 1st rounder, with this team, for a 26 year old Marshal Faulk. Not only was he a great back, he was great at catching the ball and blocking. Those are not particularly strong traits with Peterson.So, because of all that, a 3rd is the most I'd give for him...</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 742 (members: 0, guests: 742)