Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="FrankRizzo" data-source="post: 454872" data-attributes="member: 2232">The problem with your train of thought here is that a sack is better than a pressure in 95% of cases because it results in a loss of yardage.Sure sometimes a pressured pass will be picked off.... but a QB feels that pressure a lot more after he's felt the pain of a sack into the turf. I don't know why people argue otherwise as you are.... some people want to defend Clay's stats last year and say he didn't have a down year because his pressures were up, even though his sacks were waaay down. How'd that work out?When he's getting sacks, QB's are already feeling the pressure..... last year even though some claim his pressures were up, the opposing QBs obviously felt no pressure as he only had 6 sacks. 8 more would have been 55 more yardage lost, and pressure and pain felt by the QB. QB pressures, hurries, hits are nice.Sacks are the measuring stick.That's why it's the key stat they track, as pointed out by yourself. It's not done by accident.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 1,027 (members: 0, guests: 1,027)