Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
How is it that Capers still has a job with the Green Bay Packers?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sunshinepacker" data-source="post: 625717" data-attributes="member: 9033"><p>Yeah, I mentioned two. Why are we so focused on percentage of snaps? Shouldn't we care more about absolute number of snaps? I mean, who cares if a guy played 80% vs 70% if both guys played a similar number of snaps (not all defenses play the exact same number of snaps). Pointing out though that changing from absolute number of snaps doesn't really affect the analysis too greatly in this case. I just wanted to mention that percentage doesn't really make much sense when looking at how tired a guy gets.</p><p></p><p>I was also mainly talking about 2011, when Raji was at his worst, so why would I look up 2012?</p><p></p><p>Finally, you're right. Raji played more snaps than a lot of other guys in his weight range (there were a couple in his weight range though that managed the feat). That being said, he was one of the worst starting dlineman in the NFL. His number of snaps was NOT the main contributor to that sub-par play. Raji wasn't JUST bad at the end of games or at the end of the season. Or are you of the opinion that had Raji played 600 snaps vs 842 he would have been a dominant NT?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sunshinepacker, post: 625717, member: 9033"] Yeah, I mentioned two. Why are we so focused on percentage of snaps? Shouldn't we care more about absolute number of snaps? I mean, who cares if a guy played 80% vs 70% if both guys played a similar number of snaps (not all defenses play the exact same number of snaps). Pointing out though that changing from absolute number of snaps doesn't really affect the analysis too greatly in this case. I just wanted to mention that percentage doesn't really make much sense when looking at how tired a guy gets. I was also mainly talking about 2011, when Raji was at his worst, so why would I look up 2012? Finally, you're right. Raji played more snaps than a lot of other guys in his weight range (there were a couple in his weight range though that managed the feat). That being said, he was one of the worst starting dlineman in the NFL. His number of snaps was NOT the main contributor to that sub-par play. Raji wasn't JUST bad at the end of games or at the end of the season. Or are you of the opinion that had Raji played 600 snaps vs 842 he would have been a dominant NT? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
sschind
scheeler
shockerx
Latest posts
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: DoURant
13 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: Thirteen Below
27 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: Guacamole
44 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: tynimiller
55 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Not too soon 2024 roster prediction
Latest: DoURant
Today at 6:41 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
How is it that Capers still has a job with the Green Bay Packers?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top