Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
How about a "traditional" 3-4?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 573200"><p>As to the OP question...not even on a good day against a poor running team with this personnel.</p><p></p><p>Guion has been a disapointment. He was getting blown off the ball all day by that patchwork CHI offensive line. I'd like to think his problems stem from missing training camp and perhaps being brought back early from the hamstring. Based on his play alone, with no assumptions about conditioning or injuries, he's got no business playing NT, be it 0 or 1 gap.</p><p></p><p>Boyd has not been much better at NT; he looks better at DE when we do play a 3 man front.</p><p></p><p>Datone Jones looks like our next DL-to-OLB conversion project.</p><p></p><p>Pennel looks like he has the muscle and motor for traditional 3-4, but he's raw. But with the way Guion and Boyd are playing on the nose he might see more snaps.</p><p></p><p>Neal...he's a gamer and a decent pass rusher but he's just too small to be playing DE.</p><p></p><p>Peppers has no place in 3-4 DL...he's a 9 technique guy all the way...whether standing or down.</p><p></p><p>There was never a plan to play traditional 3-4 with a 0 tech NT...Raji was going to be playing the 1 tech...and there were a lot of eggs in that basket that of course never had a chance to materialize.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 573200"] As to the OP question...not even on a good day against a poor running team with this personnel. Guion has been a disapointment. He was getting blown off the ball all day by that patchwork CHI offensive line. I'd like to think his problems stem from missing training camp and perhaps being brought back early from the hamstring. Based on his play alone, with no assumptions about conditioning or injuries, he's got no business playing NT, be it 0 or 1 gap. Boyd has not been much better at NT; he looks better at DE when we do play a 3 man front. Datone Jones looks like our next DL-to-OLB conversion project. Pennel looks like he has the muscle and motor for traditional 3-4, but he's raw. But with the way Guion and Boyd are playing on the nose he might see more snaps. Neal...he's a gamer and a decent pass rusher but he's just too small to be playing DE. Peppers has no place in 3-4 DL...he's a 9 technique guy all the way...whether standing or down. There was never a plan to play traditional 3-4 with a 0 tech NT...Raji was going to be playing the 1 tech...and there were a lot of eggs in that basket that of course never had a chance to materialize. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
tynimiller
gopkrs
Latest posts
R
State of our former QB, Aaron Rodgers
Latest: rmontro
30 minutes ago
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
NFC North Predictions
Latest: Voyageur
Today at 5:57 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Time for Rules Changes
Latest: milani
Today at 5:46 PM
Introduce Yourself
Badger Volleyball 2025-26
Latest: Voyageur
Today at 5:23 PM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
R
Is it time?
Latest: rmontro
Today at 4:57 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
How about a "traditional" 3-4?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top