Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="PackerfaninCarolina" data-source="post: 801004" data-attributes="member: 9364">Sorry, but I've felt that play that got ruled a catch in D Moore's favor is what a catch should be.  I've felt if the WR had two or even 3 feet down, it should be ruled a catch.  I mean if that had been our guy that made that play, I think we would all love that the refs reversed the call.Now, on the other catch, I think Lockett or whoever actually did trap it against the ground.  But it would have been up to MM to challenge it, and he didn't, perhaps worried he would lose his timeout.I just really feel this thread is all wrong.  We lost this game because this offense including both Rodgers and McCarthy squandered too many opportunities, and the defense although it wasn't bad still had serious blunders such as Greene's awful PI when he could have turned around and made a play on the ball, and our guys not loading the box when they knew the Hawks would be running the ball to grind the clock out.</blockquote>

Total: 303 (members: 2, guests: 301)