Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
He WANTS to come back!!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pyledriver80" data-source="post: 60995" data-attributes="member: 194"><p>Yeah Ruegs would have been a good resign I think and its a good point Pack66. The problem is guys are going to go elsewhere and you are not going to get every FA that you want.</p><p></p><p>Why does it seem that everything is either one way or another.</p><p></p><p>First, you got TRO, TT's right hand man, who defends every move TT makes. He even found a way to say Cundiff was a good signing.</p><p></p><p>Then.......</p><p></p><p></p><p>You got Pack 66 who would love to kick in TT's teeth. Every move TT makes is the wrong one, he should have resigned every player GB lost and Every Free Agent available.</p><p></p><p>I think its funny but honestly I think that its hard to take anything you guys say seriously because I know its biased and not looked at from an objective perspective.</p><p></p><p>I think most Packer fans are somewhere in the middle. Could TT have done more? No Doubt. Could have TT done less? Of course.</p><p></p><p>On one side Cundiff was a good signing, and on the other we should have signed Larry Allen who is a fat,old washed up lineman who doesn't fit the scheme at all.</p><p></p><p>I do not try to speak for everyone but I think......</p><p></p><p>Cundiff was a bad signing</p><p>Letting Ruegamer go was a bad decision</p><p>Not getting AV was a bad decision, but not really TT's fault</p><p>Resigning Davenport struck me as odd as well.</p><p>TT did nothing in the off-season last year, horrendous job.</p><p></p><p>On the other side of things</p><p></p><p>Resigning Green,Henderson,Kampman etc was a good decision</p><p>Pickett was a good sign</p><p>Boerichter was a good sign</p><p>Taylor was a good sign</p><p>TT giving Brett time is a good thing</p><p></p><p> and then</p><p></p><p>Keeping Fergie's *** around is questionable</p><p>Manual is risky but could pay off</p><p></p><p>It's not black and white in the eyes of the majority of posters here. We like some moves, we dislike others. Understand that there are 31 other teams looking for players and trying to improve. You win some, you lose some but unless you are doing one or the other really good or really bad you will be a middle of the road team.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pyledriver80, post: 60995, member: 194"] Yeah Ruegs would have been a good resign I think and its a good point Pack66. The problem is guys are going to go elsewhere and you are not going to get every FA that you want. Why does it seem that everything is either one way or another. First, you got TRO, TT's right hand man, who defends every move TT makes. He even found a way to say Cundiff was a good signing. Then....... You got Pack 66 who would love to kick in TT's teeth. Every move TT makes is the wrong one, he should have resigned every player GB lost and Every Free Agent available. I think its funny but honestly I think that its hard to take anything you guys say seriously because I know its biased and not looked at from an objective perspective. I think most Packer fans are somewhere in the middle. Could TT have done more? No Doubt. Could have TT done less? Of course. On one side Cundiff was a good signing, and on the other we should have signed Larry Allen who is a fat,old washed up lineman who doesn't fit the scheme at all. I do not try to speak for everyone but I think...... Cundiff was a bad signing Letting Ruegamer go was a bad decision Not getting AV was a bad decision, but not really TT's fault Resigning Davenport struck me as odd as well. TT did nothing in the off-season last year, horrendous job. On the other side of things Resigning Green,Henderson,Kampman etc was a good decision Pickett was a good sign Boerichter was a good sign Taylor was a good sign TT giving Brett time is a good thing and then Keeping Fergie's *** around is questionable Manual is risky but could pay off It's not black and white in the eyes of the majority of posters here. We like some moves, we dislike others. Understand that there are 31 other teams looking for players and trying to improve. You win some, you lose some but unless you are doing one or the other really good or really bad you will be a middle of the road team. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 11:12 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 10:57 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 3:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 2:00 PM
Movies and Entertainment
M
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Magooch
Yesterday at 11:43 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
He WANTS to come back!!!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
