Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="mradtke66" data-source="post: 905422" data-attributes="member: 4199">I really hate these comparisons across eras.  What makes a good quarterback has changed too much to make it anything approaching fair.Starr played in an era with fewer substitutions, but most (all?) quarterbacks called their own plays.  We didn't have radios in the helmet yet.  They were closer to true "field generals" in this sense.  Smart player, knew how to run the offense to a T.  Very much Payton Manning's Brain.But Starr was physically limited.  You drop him into an offense from the 1990s on and he will get exposed.  I don't think he could throw the deep out.  It'd be an interception waiting to happen.  Much much Payton Manning's Corpse from 2015.As far as talent and physical ability, Starr is probably the 4th or 5th best Packers quarterback I can think of.  Rodgers and Favre obviously, but ****ey as well.  Perhaps tied with the Magic Man?</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 1,204 (members: 0, guests: 1,204)