Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Have the Packers EVER had a stud back?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="El Guapo" data-source="post: 515097" data-attributes="member: 5830"><p>You are missing the big picture here Bus. You obviously didn't like that I posted statistical facts that contradicted your argument. So let's try another way. Often times the teams that win championships are ones that get their worst players to be better than the other team's worst players. Team sports are less about how many studs you have at any position, versus how well they play as a team.</p><p></p><p>Barry Sanders was a stud RB. That didn't get the Lions very far. Belichik is successful because he gets nobodies to play like HOFers for a few years. It's great to pine for having an all-time RB, but why do you think it's necessary? It's not. You want someone to "post with a straight face" that past Packer RBs were great/studs/outstanding.... why? What does it matter. Those guys got the job done and it was enough to win a Super Bowl with the rest of the team's effort.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="El Guapo, post: 515097, member: 5830"] You are missing the big picture here Bus. You obviously didn't like that I posted statistical facts that contradicted your argument. So let's try another way. Often times the teams that win championships are ones that get their worst players to be better than the other team's worst players. Team sports are less about how many studs you have at any position, versus how well they play as a team. Barry Sanders was a stud RB. That didn't get the Lions very far. Belichik is successful because he gets nobodies to play like HOFers for a few years. It's great to pine for having an all-time RB, but why do you think it's necessary? It's not. You want someone to "post with a straight face" that past Packer RBs were great/studs/outstanding.... why? What does it matter. Those guys got the job done and it was enough to win a Super Bowl with the rest of the team's effort. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Schultz
Emur
Guacamole
gopkrs
tynimiller
Latest posts
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: Guacamole
3 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: tynimiller
14 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Not too soon 2024 roster prediction
Latest: DoURant
23 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: DoURant
Today at 5:26 PM
Draft Talk
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 3:32 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Have the Packers EVER had a stud back?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top