Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Haha, Cobb, and Matthews extensions?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 778024" data-attributes="member: 7261"><p>Maybe before you make that statement and try to put too much weight on it, you should look at who those top 15 teams were first? After you do that, look at who of those 15 teams did the Packers play against and after that, what games Clay played in and how many snaps. I will do the math for you. Clay did not get sacks in 4 games against the top 15 teams in fewest sacks allowed.</p><p></p><p>1 <a href="http://www.espn.com/nfl/team/_/name/lac/los-angeles-chargers" target="_blank">LA Chargers</a> 18 Packers Did not play</p><p>2 <a href="http://www.espn.com/nfl/team/_/name/no/new-orleans-saints" target="_blank">New Orleans</a> 20 Clay played....0 sacks</p><p>3 <a href="http://www.espn.com/nfl/team/_/name/atl/atlanta-falcons" target="_blank">Atlanta</a> 24 Clay had 1.5 sacks</p><p> <a href="http://www.espn.com/nfl/team/_/name/oak/oakland-raiders" target="_blank">Oakland</a> 24 Packers Did not play</p><p> <a href="http://www.espn.com/nfl/team/_/name/pit/pittsburgh-steelers" target="_blank">Pittsburgh</a> 24 Clay Did not play</p><p> <a href="http://www.espn.com/nfl/team/_/name/jax/jacksonville-jaguars" target="_blank">Jacksonville</a> 24 Packers Did not play</p><p>7 <a href="http://www.espn.com/nfl/team/_/name/min/minnesota-vikings" target="_blank">Minnesota</a> 27 Clay played 1 game....0 sacks</p><p> <a href="http://www.espn.com/nfl/team/_/name/bal/baltimore-ravens" target="_blank">Baltimore</a> 27 Clay had 1 sack on only 13 plays</p><p>9 <a href="http://www.espn.com/nfl/team/_/name/lar/los-angeles-rams" target="_blank">LA Rams</a> 28 Packers Did not play</p><p>10 <a href="http://www.espn.com/nfl/team/_/name/dal/dallas-cowboys" target="_blank">Dallas</a> 32 Clay played....0 sacks</p><p>11 <a href="http://www.espn.com/nfl/team/_/name/mia/miami-dolphins" target="_blank">Miami</a> 33 Packers Did not play</p><p>12 <a href="http://www.espn.com/nfl/team/_/name/nyg/new-york-giants" target="_blank">NY Giants</a> 34 Packers Did not play</p><p>13 <a href="http://www.espn.com/nfl/team/_/name/ten/tennessee-titans" target="_blank">Tennessee</a> 35 Packers Did not play</p><p> <a href="http://www.espn.com/nfl/team/_/name/ne/new-england-patriots" target="_blank">New England</a> 35 Packers Did not play</p><p> <a href="http://www.espn.com/nfl/team/_/name/car/carolina-panthers" target="_blank">Carolina</a> 35 Clay played....0 sacks</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pokerbrat2000, post: 778024, member: 7261"] Maybe before you make that statement and try to put too much weight on it, you should look at who those top 15 teams were first? After you do that, look at who of those 15 teams did the Packers play against and after that, what games Clay played in and how many snaps. I will do the math for you. Clay did not get sacks in 4 games against the top 15 teams in fewest sacks allowed. 1 [URL='http://www.espn.com/nfl/team/_/name/lac/los-angeles-chargers']LA Chargers[/URL] 18 Packers Did not play 2 [URL='http://www.espn.com/nfl/team/_/name/no/new-orleans-saints']New Orleans[/URL] 20 Clay played....0 sacks 3 [URL='http://www.espn.com/nfl/team/_/name/atl/atlanta-falcons']Atlanta[/URL] 24 Clay had 1.5 sacks [URL='http://www.espn.com/nfl/team/_/name/oak/oakland-raiders']Oakland[/URL] 24 Packers Did not play [URL='http://www.espn.com/nfl/team/_/name/pit/pittsburgh-steelers']Pittsburgh[/URL] 24 Clay Did not play [URL='http://www.espn.com/nfl/team/_/name/jax/jacksonville-jaguars']Jacksonville[/URL] 24 Packers Did not play 7 [URL='http://www.espn.com/nfl/team/_/name/min/minnesota-vikings']Minnesota[/URL] 27 Clay played 1 game....0 sacks [URL='http://www.espn.com/nfl/team/_/name/bal/baltimore-ravens']Baltimore[/URL] 27 Clay had 1 sack on only 13 plays 9 [URL='http://www.espn.com/nfl/team/_/name/lar/los-angeles-rams']LA Rams[/URL] 28 Packers Did not play 10 [URL='http://www.espn.com/nfl/team/_/name/dal/dallas-cowboys']Dallas[/URL] 32 Clay played....0 sacks 11 [URL='http://www.espn.com/nfl/team/_/name/mia/miami-dolphins']Miami[/URL] 33 Packers Did not play 12 [URL='http://www.espn.com/nfl/team/_/name/nyg/new-york-giants']NY Giants[/URL] 34 Packers Did not play 13 [URL='http://www.espn.com/nfl/team/_/name/ten/tennessee-titans']Tennessee[/URL] 35 Packers Did not play [URL='http://www.espn.com/nfl/team/_/name/ne/new-england-patriots']New England[/URL] 35 Packers Did not play [URL='http://www.espn.com/nfl/team/_/name/car/carolina-panthers']Carolina[/URL] 35 Clay played....0 sacks [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
GreenBaySlacker
CarryTheG14
Latest posts
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
1 minute ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Prior to Training Camp - Predicting the 53 Man Roster
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
3 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
M
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: mradtke66
15 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: milani
37 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 10:10 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Haha, Cobb, and Matthews extensions?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
