Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 617030">Not according to the link I posted.  Regardless, the point was that Kuhn was blocking on "many if not most" of the runs in the second half.  According to your numbers, "nearly half" would be the right characterization.  So, you've said nothing to cause me to alter my analysis.  Hmm...I think I missed Starks 1 carry for 2 yards against New England.  Regardless, you're really going to correct 181 to 182?   When correcting errors to discredit an argument, you should stick to the ones that matter.  In those cases, I will concede the point as I have in the past.  This kind of correction just looks petty.Kuhn pass blocked only 24 times all season.  Rodgers injury had nothing to do with it.  McCarthy judged that Lacy would run more effectively in a 2-back set.  He was right.  Right enough he gave Lacy the ball more often and to better affect."Value to the team" is an amorphous term.  The issue is the FB position.  It was not so long ago you were absolutely convinced the Packers would not carry 2 FBs.  We debated the point.  If you still believe that, while thinking there is no reason to worry about the position, then I must conclude have no FB is nothing to worry about in your mind.  Correct?</blockquote>

Total: 869 (members: 4, guests: 865)