Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 617020">Tolzien was signed two months before he had to play in his first game with the Packers. He showed some promise during those appearances although he most likely didn't get any snaps with the #1 offense before he was named the starter the week before the Giants game. IMO it's untealistic to expect any better results under those circumstances.Barclay's health is an issue, hopefully he'll be 100% when camp opens next week.Kuhn only played 134 snaps, with 85 of them coming in run blocking, during the second half of the regular season when Lacy and Starks combined to carry the ball 182 times. His playing time increased as soon as Rodgers injured his calf at Tampa.Don't get me wrong, I understand Kuhn's value to the team but I don't think there's a need to worry about his backup.Overall the defensive line has sufficient talent with Daniels, Raji, Guion, Jones and Boyd. A lot of the unit's performance is dependent on the play of Raji, which I'm nervous about but there's some hope he will at least be improved compared to 2011-13. There isn't a single 3-4 team in this league being seven deep with experienced players on the DL capable of not missing a beat ith two guys being suspended.While that's true I was referring to your statement not including them in your list of youngsters who got significant playing time in 2014.</blockquote>

Total: 871 (members: 4, guests: 867)