Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Green Bay should go get DK Metcalf
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mradtke66" data-source="post: 953519" data-attributes="member: 4199"><p>I'd be willing to accept that the Lions (division team) and Bucs (likely playoff opponent) might not make the trade, but that's not the same as a no-way from your initial reply.</p><p></p><p>Chiefs, Fins, and Bengals might be more interested. Just because they haven't, doesn't mean they won't.</p><p></p><p>I'm also not going to say the will either. It certainly takes both teams to swing the trade.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Chiefs, Fins, and Bengals would technically "win" the trade, if only by a handful of 10s of points. (It also assumes all teams in such a trade are using same-enough charts.) </p><p></p><p>It could also work out each of those teams don't like who's left on the board. They could be looking to trade down.</p><p></p><p>Alternative alternative: 53, 59, 92 would work out to 21 from the Pats. Bill loves his volumes of picks....</p><p></p><p>I'm also not saying we need to make these trades. If we like who's there when our original picks are on the clock, no need to trade. If the board starts to fall in a way that lets you get higher to get someone a tier or two left on your board? Don't be afraid to go get them.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mradtke66, post: 953519, member: 4199"] I'd be willing to accept that the Lions (division team) and Bucs (likely playoff opponent) might not make the trade, but that's not the same as a no-way from your initial reply. Chiefs, Fins, and Bengals might be more interested. Just because they haven't, doesn't mean they won't. I'm also not going to say the will either. It certainly takes both teams to swing the trade. Chiefs, Fins, and Bengals would technically "win" the trade, if only by a handful of 10s of points. (It also assumes all teams in such a trade are using same-enough charts.) It could also work out each of those teams don't like who's left on the board. They could be looking to trade down. Alternative alternative: 53, 59, 92 would work out to 21 from the Pats. Bill loves his volumes of picks.... I'm also not saying we need to make these trades. If we like who's there when our original picks are on the clock, no need to trade. If the board starts to fall in a way that lets you get higher to get someone a tier or two left on your board? Don't be afraid to go get them.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Pkrjones
lllrkalll
Latest posts
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pkrjones
3 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Badgers Football 2025-2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:07 AM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 8:43 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
H
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Half Empty
Today at 8:32 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Today at 7:44 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Green Bay should go get DK Metcalf
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top