Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="easyk83" data-source="post: 767001" data-attributes="member: 8895">Yes, I feel like signing James would be akin to giving up on a superbly talented player, Josh Jones, after just one year and oh yeah both players are said to be supreme physical talents who need to improve in areas like diagnosing plays, playing too aggressive, getting locked in on routes and tunnel vision. I feel like James is just the somewhat better version of Josh Jones but probably not worth the investment. Especially not when we need help elsewhere. The more I think about it the more I think that Davenport is the likely candidate. In Pettine's scheme he can be used predominantly as an edge setting pass rusher.If Gute takes after TT he'll look for long term upside, artificial value downgrade(small school, age, weird position projection, late bloomer). Between Davenports measurables and the way that he trashed OTs at the Senior Bowl its possible that the FO looks at him and decides that but for him being a late bloomer he would have gone to a powerhouse program and turned into a top 3 pick. Look at this kids measurables versus those of Myles Garrett and Jadaveon Clowney. Then look at his performance against good OT prospects at the Senior Bowl.If Gute picks either Josh Jackson or a guard at 14 you will all be able to hear my stream of  profanities wherever you are.</blockquote>

Total: 152 (members: 3, guests: 149)