Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Greatest Packer team of all time
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="porky88" data-source="post: 82174" data-attributes="member: 489"><p>Jim Brown was ahead of his era. All you have to do his watch. Would he been as dominate in the 90's as he was in the 60's. Probably not but I wouldn't doubt him anyways.</p><p></p><p>Hourning and Taylor on the other hand are small backs and not that fast. Bart Starr was pretty small and couldn't move in the pocket. They'd get crush. 90's will always usually beat the 60's.</p><p></p><p>Now if we had equal era's 60's vs 90's and equal weight sets, etc..</p><p></p><p>That's be interesting. I guess it'd come down to what group had the most potential. If it came down to coaching, with all do respect to Holmgrem he's great but I'd go 60's then because of Lombardi. Lombardi is the greatest coach of all time. So with equal training, eating, vitamins, etc... 60's (as long as they stayed inside the night before) because the coaching might get it.</p><p></p><p>That's a good question Hammer.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="porky88, post: 82174, member: 489"] Jim Brown was ahead of his era. All you have to do his watch. Would he been as dominate in the 90's as he was in the 60's. Probably not but I wouldn't doubt him anyways. Hourning and Taylor on the other hand are small backs and not that fast. Bart Starr was pretty small and couldn't move in the pocket. They'd get crush. 90's will always usually beat the 60's. Now if we had equal era's 60's vs 90's and equal weight sets, etc.. That's be interesting. I guess it'd come down to what group had the most potential. If it came down to coaching, with all do respect to Holmgrem he's great but I'd go 60's then because of Lombardi. Lombardi is the greatest coach of all time. So with equal training, eating, vitamins, etc... 60's (as long as they stayed inside the night before) because the coaching might get it. That's a good question Hammer. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
tynimiller
RicFlairoftheNFL
ThePerfectBeard
ExpatPacker
scheeler
Schultz
DABIGZ
Team Ronny
rmontro
Azpackfan4
PackerinSD
Sanguine camper
DoURant
yxz1000r
gatorpack
Todd Princl
Firethorn1001
Pkrjones
AKCheese
shockerx
RepStar15
Packer Fan in SD
Latest posts
R
I had This Nightmare
Latest: RicFlairoftheNFL
A moment ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: tynimiller
A moment ago
Draft Talk
R
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: RicFlairoftheNFL
2 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
2024 2nd Rd pick #45 Edgerrin Cooper LB
Latest: RicFlairoftheNFL
3 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 1st Rd pick #25 Jorden Morgan OL
Latest: longtimefan
Today at 7:45 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Greatest Packer team of all time
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top