Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="GreenNGold_81" data-source="post: 862289" data-attributes="member: 11374"><p>I mean, at the time, who else would they have taken? Sweat...? possibly, but was diagnosed with a heart condition that may or may not have been a false diagnosis. He had 7 sacks this season. Fant?  That seemed a little high for him. Burns had 7.5 sacks... I guess Sweat or Burns may have been better choices, but factor in their playing time, I'd be willing to wager they had more snaps though I'm too lazy to look. Brown (either one, wr) would probably have been better picks who could contribute more this year, but if the team picked him to spell the Smith's in a couple years which is my theory then maybe he's the better long term pick. I dunno. Certainly, the pick could cost Gutey his job in a few years if he busts as realistically how many years will we have two first-round picks with Rodgers. The word last year was that THIS draft (2020) was going to be chalk full of WR's. What sucks though is in the mocks I've seen like 3-4 wr's are taken before the Packers pick. This may be a good year to trade up then and take the guy we want.</p></blockquote><p></p>

Total: 1,105 (members: 2, guests: 1,103)