Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 939596" data-attributes="member: 7261"><p>In the true sense of the penalty, yes, I agree with you.  However, I think that is one they may/should review and try to tweak this offseason.  Too many times this year it has been called in a situation where the defender is diving to tackle the ball carrier and brushes up against the blockers lower legs. The penalty was intended to dissuade defenders from intentionally taking blockers legs out from underneath them, not to protect the ball carrier from diving tackles.</p></blockquote><p></p>

No members online now.

Total: 655 (members: 1, guests: 654)