Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Voyageur" data-source="post: 938344" data-attributes="member: 17953">It sounds like they're using the laws of probability to factor in to their testing. If one test has an 80% chance of being accurate, giving a second test immediately after the first would give them a 96% chance of being accurate. Now, if you get one in each direction, you're going to have to start all over. You technically couldn't even trust two negatives in a row after the first test was a positive. You'd need to confirm it with a 4th test, to bring you back to 96%.That's about the only reasoning I can see to be honest.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 629 (members: 1, guests: 628)