Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="thequick12" data-source="post: 818997" data-attributes="member: 9797">Are you saying Thomas isn't worth 9 million a year ?  Because I guess I would tend to agree but then Amos certainly isn't worth 8.   The only reason I agree Thomas isn't worth 9 is because of the injury history the age doesn't bother me safeties Specifically elite ones tend to play at a very high level late into their careers and years.  If you knew Thomas would play every game he's 100% worth 9 million a year but you don't so he's probably not.   But I was just commenting on the suggestion the packers should sign Amos for 9 m per.  In which case I'd rather throw that money at Thomas the proven guy rather than the guy you say is "ascending " because he had 2 picks last season doubling his career total.  Amos isn't a bad player he may even be an above avg starter.  He just doesn't make plays and the packers already had that in Morgan Burnett.  And don't get me wrong that guy is awesome to have as your number 2 safety when you have nick Collins or say earl Thomas or even in the situation Amos would be leaving Eddie Robinson.  But asking Amos to be your number 1 play making safety is a recipe for the same tired play we've seen back there since Collins.  Amos is robin not Batman and what's robin without batman?</blockquote>

Total: 745 (members: 1, guests: 744)