Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 867075" data-attributes="member: 7261">Picking up a veteran off of waivers mid season and paying him $520k is much different than signing a FA WR in March, but sure, lets use Ryan Grant as a basis to never sign a FA WR. <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/rolleyes.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll Eyes    :rolleyes:" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" />If anything, Ryan Grant may prove a point.  Why didn't he ever play a down for the Packers?  He wasn't injured, I didn't hear of any off the field issues, could it be that he just couldn't pick up the Packers offense and connect with Rodgers in that short of time?  Ahhh yes, but a Rookie will for sure.I think the consensus of most is that the depth of the current group of WR's on the Packer roster doesn't exactly scream "great", "good" or even "average".  Adding just a rookie into that and expecting a big improvement is asking/expecting too much IMO.  This conversation has gone around and around, I'm going to step back and see just what the Packers do in Free Agency and the draft and then revisit it.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 1,074 (members: 0, guests: 1,074)