Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 866851" data-attributes="member: 7261">First of all, define "immediate impact".  Because I have a feeling our definitions are different.  When have I completely ignored that the possibility exists?I have said the same thing over and over in most of my posts about the Packers drafting a  Rookie WR:<ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">It's time to invest a high pick in one.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Is there a possibility that said WR contributes year 1?  Yes</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Given the history of rookie WR's in GB, I wouldn't overly rely on #2.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Because of #3, as well as a pretty crappy current WR depth chart, it would be nice to add a mid Tier FA WR to hopefully see immediate improvement in 2020.</li> </ol>So no, I am not ignoring the possibility of a rookie WR having an immediate impact, but what I am saying is that if I am Gute, I am not solely relying on it.  Even as a #2 or #3 WR, I would expect a rookie WR to match the #'s of any of the WR's not named Adams last season.  To expect and rely on more, I think is expecting too much.  Would putting up those kinds of numbers be an immediate impact?  Not really, would just be another WR out there.Just out of curiosity, who was the last rookie WR in Green Bay that had an immediate impact?</blockquote>

Total: 1,004 (members: 1, guests: 1,003)