Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 866732" data-attributes="member: 7261">I tend to agree with this and I think the 'discomfort" any team is going to have with signing Bulaga is not knowing how long his body will actually hold up.  He will be 31 on the 21st of this month and has a history of a lot of injuries.  How long of a contract do you give him and how long of one does he want and at what money?  Bulaga is probably at best a 2 year investment, if the Packers think they can find a younger cheaper option, with a bit of a drop off in skills, go for it.  As far as Hooper goes, I don't think you find a younger, cheaper option with his talent, at least not "ready made".Signing Hooper is planning for the future, Bulaga is just a stop gap until you can find his replacement, which they already whiffed on with Spriggs.</blockquote>

Total: 1,259 (members: 2, guests: 1,257)