Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Fox Sports "Power Ranking"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Danreb" data-source="post: 164993" data-attributes="member: 621"><p>Romo only made it to the Pro Bowl because Bledsoe got injured? That's the stupidest statement I've ever heard. What is it with "true" Packer fans and their love for 80-year old QB's? Sorry, Romo went to the Pro Bowl because he played better consistently than everybody else. Favre would be a logical answer, but when you throw as many TD's as interceptions, that's not a Pro Bowl-type season.</p><p></p><p>The Cowboys offense is better than Green Bay's by almost every category.</p><p></p><p>Quarterback--okay, Favre is better.</p><p>Running Back--We're the only ones in the league who are going with a rookie and a bunch of inexperienced nobodies.</p><p>Wide Receiver--T.O. outclasses all our receivers. The truth is in the numbers. Despite being injured, T.O. had more TD's than anybody else. Glenn is more consistent than Jennings. Crayton is more experienced than Jones.</p><p>TE -- Witten and Fasano are better than Lee and Franks.</p><p>Offensive Line -- Their D is full on power. You can't compare a power line to a ZBS line.</p><p></p><p>DEFENSE</p><p>D-Line -- GB has the better D-Line with greater depth.</p><p>LB -- GB has the better LB's, but Dallas has better depth with Carpenter and Ware.</p><p>Secondary -- Roy Williams and Ken Hamlin are two of the hardest hitting safeties in the league. Terence Newman is one of the top CB's in the NFL, and Henry is a consistent playmaker. Dallas' has a better secondary because of their experience.</p><p></p><p>Wade Phillips is a defensive minded coach. They won't be affected.</p><p></p><p>You can go ahead and talk about your transition phases with new coaches, but look at Eric Mangini and Sean Payton. Who's to say Wade Phillips won't do anything? Is anybody questioning the Chargers because last time I checked, none of their old coaches are returning.</p><p></p><p>I'm a Packer fan, but I'm not delusional like the rest of you seem to be. If Dallas went head-to-head with GB, I'd still pick GB. But Dallas definitely has the better team.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Danreb, post: 164993, member: 621"] Romo only made it to the Pro Bowl because Bledsoe got injured? That's the stupidest statement I've ever heard. What is it with "true" Packer fans and their love for 80-year old QB's? Sorry, Romo went to the Pro Bowl because he played better consistently than everybody else. Favre would be a logical answer, but when you throw as many TD's as interceptions, that's not a Pro Bowl-type season. The Cowboys offense is better than Green Bay's by almost every category. Quarterback--okay, Favre is better. Running Back--We're the only ones in the league who are going with a rookie and a bunch of inexperienced nobodies. Wide Receiver--T.O. outclasses all our receivers. The truth is in the numbers. Despite being injured, T.O. had more TD's than anybody else. Glenn is more consistent than Jennings. Crayton is more experienced than Jones. TE -- Witten and Fasano are better than Lee and Franks. Offensive Line -- Their D is full on power. You can't compare a power line to a ZBS line. DEFENSE D-Line -- GB has the better D-Line with greater depth. LB -- GB has the better LB's, but Dallas has better depth with Carpenter and Ware. Secondary -- Roy Williams and Ken Hamlin are two of the hardest hitting safeties in the league. Terence Newman is one of the top CB's in the NFL, and Henry is a consistent playmaker. Dallas' has a better secondary because of their experience. Wade Phillips is a defensive minded coach. They won't be affected. You can go ahead and talk about your transition phases with new coaches, but look at Eric Mangini and Sean Payton. Who's to say Wade Phillips won't do anything? Is anybody questioning the Chargers because last time I checked, none of their old coaches are returning. I'm a Packer fan, but I'm not delusional like the rest of you seem to be. If Dallas went head-to-head with GB, I'd still pick GB. But Dallas definitely has the better team. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Green_Bay_Packers
GreenBaySlacker
SudsMcBucky
gopkrs
Emur
Latest posts
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
13 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The 11th Annual Amish Draft Contest 2024
Latest: Voyageur
39 minutes ago
Draft Talk
R
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: RicFlairoftheNFL
53 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: Guacamole
Today at 10:21 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: Krabs
Today at 9:37 AM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Fox Sports "Power Ranking"
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top