Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="longtimefan" data-source="post: 526427" data-attributes="member: 145">Stop with the win loss stuff...We all know that sometimes that isnt on the q/b (all the arguments on rodgers in 4th q losses)You said Flynn stunk it up with out being prepared..With a guy that was in this system for how long and STILL stunk it up....But then went toe to toe with Brady with a week tp prepareIf you feel that way then for Flynn then why isnt it possible that Wallace could have done almost similar things?  Then you say his history shows he is a loser...Then look up Josh Mckonwn history, it mirrors Wallace's.....Josh showing that just because a q/b under performs for YEARS....Right system can help a q/b to make him a winner...Josh for about 10 years was a loser and % of completions is worse than Wallace iirc, or very close to it...Facts are there that it is very possible for Wallace to have been better than Scott..</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 864 (members: 0, guests: 864)