Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="jon" data-source="post: 886295" data-attributes="member: 15113">It's not, of course, but there is substance to the observation that the individual and combined records of the teams the Packers beat are not impressive.My point, apparently poorly stated, is that GB should do very well for the rest of the season while very possibly losing to a couple of good teams.  If this happens, many people will say the same thing that many said last year.  In my view, this is understandable and might even be correct even though, as someone once noted, winning is the only thing.  I also think, FWIW, that GB is not now at the same level as KC and a couple others. It's kind of like the Bears over recent weeks:  they are not very good but all they do is win.  The bloom came off that rose last night, and, while GB is notably better than the Bears, for the Packers to shake the doubters they will have to beat a strong team.  I would like to see this before January.</blockquote>

Total: 306 (members: 3, guests: 303)