Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Fixing the run Defense
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TJV" data-source="post: 570216" data-attributes="member: 4300"><p>It seems a couple of posters are ignoring the fact Capers played a 4-3 against the Seahawks in the first half. It too was ineffective. Also after a decent start last season against the run, a DL composed of Raji, Pickett, and Wilson – two behemoths and a 300+ pounder - played the run very poorly. Combine that with captainWIMM's post about the average size of DL in the 3-4 tells me it's not the size of the players - or IMO necessarily the scheme. As captainWIMM posted, stopping the run is all about the talent of the front 7.</p><p></p><p>So what about the talent of the Packers front 7? A healthy Matthews is an all pro. I think it’s reasonable to expect the addition of Peppers will make a difference. Most of us thought Daniels was on the verge of being a difference maker but against the Seahawks, he was bad and Datone Jones did nothing. Who else can realistically be called a difference maker?</p><p></p><p>OTOH, here’s the good news:</p><p>• Yes the D was bad vs. the run but got good pressure in the passing game.</p><p>• I wish it were not because of injury, but Brad Jones will be replaced as a starter. The best case scenario will be if Lattimore grabs this opportunity and keeps the starting job.</p><p>• IMO it’s unlikely Daniels will continue the crappy play he displayed at Seattle.</p><p>• Again the circumstances are unfortunate but it’s likely Pennel will get a shot at anchoring the interior of the DL. It’s unrealistic to expect him to duplicate Raji’s disruptive play (at his best) but he’s got to better than Guion was vs. the run.</p><p>• The depth and talent in the defensive backfield should help the play of the front 7.</p><p>• Most importantly, it matters one-hell-of-a-lot more how a team plays at the end of the season than how it begins. The Packers have changed the parts of their front 7 and have also changed their strategy. Peppers is playing a new role, it’s realistic IMO to expect him to get more comfortable and better. Datone is young enough to expect him to get better with experience; same for Boyd. DBs like Clinton-Dix, Richardson, and Hyde should get better as the season goes on, and they should help the run D.</p><p></p><p>None of that guarantees anything of course. All I’m saying is that there is still a realistic hope this D improves as the season goes on.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TJV, post: 570216, member: 4300"] It seems a couple of posters are ignoring the fact Capers played a 4-3 against the Seahawks in the first half. It too was ineffective. Also after a decent start last season against the run, a DL composed of Raji, Pickett, and Wilson – two behemoths and a 300+ pounder - played the run very poorly. Combine that with captainWIMM's post about the average size of DL in the 3-4 tells me it's not the size of the players - or IMO necessarily the scheme. As captainWIMM posted, stopping the run is all about the talent of the front 7. So what about the talent of the Packers front 7? A healthy Matthews is an all pro. I think it’s reasonable to expect the addition of Peppers will make a difference. Most of us thought Daniels was on the verge of being a difference maker but against the Seahawks, he was bad and Datone Jones did nothing. Who else can realistically be called a difference maker? OTOH, here’s the good news: • Yes the D was bad vs. the run but got good pressure in the passing game. • I wish it were not because of injury, but Brad Jones will be replaced as a starter. The best case scenario will be if Lattimore grabs this opportunity and keeps the starting job. • IMO it’s unlikely Daniels will continue the crappy play he displayed at Seattle. • Again the circumstances are unfortunate but it’s likely Pennel will get a shot at anchoring the interior of the DL. It’s unrealistic to expect him to duplicate Raji’s disruptive play (at his best) but he’s got to better than Guion was vs. the run. • The depth and talent in the defensive backfield should help the play of the front 7. • Most importantly, it matters one-hell-of-a-lot more how a team plays at the end of the season than how it begins. The Packers have changed the parts of their front 7 and have also changed their strategy. Peppers is playing a new role, it’s realistic IMO to expect him to get more comfortable and better. Datone is young enough to expect him to get better with experience; same for Boyd. DBs like Clinton-Dix, Richardson, and Hyde should get better as the season goes on, and they should help the run D. None of that guarantees anything of course. All I’m saying is that there is still a realistic hope this D improves as the season goes on. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Green_Bay_Packers
Guacamole
Latest posts
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
35 minutes ago
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
R
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: rmontro
Yesterday at 8:07 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 6:14 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 5:41 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 3:06 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Fixing the run Defense
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top