Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Half Empty" data-source="post: 617966" data-attributes="member: 10288"><p>Once you start with "IMO", (a) you're correct in virtually anything you say and (b) that's my point about semantics.  I consider average to be right in there with OK, serviceable, and yes, good.  When I said AJ was probably good, until the last year or two, the implied point was that he was now below good - in some minds that's absolutely terrible, probably not the term I'd use, but certainly in line with my position that he had dropped off significantly.  If someone wanted to sing his praises for his last year or two, that's another discussion.  Otherwise, IMO, average and good are reasonably similar, as are terrible and a dropoff from good.  All those descriptions mean nobody cringed when he took the field until the last year or two, when we did.</p></blockquote><p></p>

Total: 606 (members: 2, guests: 604)