Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Magooch" data-source="post: 1090444" data-attributes="member: 17987">Some truth to that for sure, but I would also think that's one of those cases where if that was something we were really good with....we would've already called it by now? Our ongoing negotiations makes it pretty clear that's not a preferred outcome for us and probably only happens if we absolutely can't get an agreement with MLF to continue AND can't find agreeable trade offer (both for us and Matt). And then like I said we're in a bind for any assistant positions, which is amplified the longer the negotiations get drawn out. We lose Hafley (or Covington, Ansley, etc) and we're gonna have a hard time convincing anyone decent to replace them when the HC status is up in the air. And the longer it takes the less good options are left, so then we're in a spot where we're trying to convince the leftover scraps to sign on for what may very well amount to a one-year DC / assistant gig. Not many folks are going to want that, and the ones who are still available at that point AND willing to take on the role....are probably guys who are still left available for a reason. Maybe it is worst-case scenario for Matt in some ways, and maybe it is technically still an option for us, but I think Policy and Co would very much like to avoid that</blockquote>

Total: 615 (members: 2, guests: 613)