Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Quientus" data-source="post: 255030" data-attributes="member: 1834">It's a difficult comparison for several reason ... - The 1996 Packers won the Super Bowl, but went into the play-offs being 13-3 ... The Bronco's entered from a 12-4 ...It can be argued both ways ..., however the 1996 will probably still be regarded as the "best" of those two teams, unless the Vikings manage to win a Super Bowl this year. Because even if the Vikings should manage a 14-2 or better regular season record, - it could be argued that the 09 Vikings is indeed better than the 1996 Packers, one important thing will still be missing ... - The Super Bowl Win ...Once in the play-offs, anything can happen ... - Just ask the 16-0 Patriots ...Season / Super Bowl Winner / Regular Season:2008 Pittsburg Steelers (entered the play offs with a 12-4)2007 NY Giants (entered with a 10-6)2006 Indianapolis Colts (entered with a 12-4)2005 Pittsburg Steelers (11-5)So there are alot of ways to determine "Best" team really ... But looking at the "factual" composition of the two teams 1996 Packers vs. the 2009 Vikings ... - More than likely ... when you look at the entire team ... - Alot of arguements *could* be made that the 2009 are in fact the "better" team, however ... untill or IF the 2009 Vikings actually manages to win a Super Bowl, that comparison will be kinda moot ...</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 84 (members: 0, guests: 84)